• Study shows that response times plummeted when a drone carrying an automated external defibrillator was used for simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest episodes.

    Someday soon, drones toting life-saving medical equipment and supplies may zip across the skies over the United States on missions of mercy.

    A new study published this week in shows that a drone hauling an automated external defibrillator drastically reduced emergency response times by an average of 16 minutes for simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

    Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States has a low survival rate of between 8% -10%, so reducing time to defibrillation is a critical factor for increasing survival. A 12 lbs. drone with a 1.7 lbs. AED attached was used in this study, which was conducted in Sweden.

    The drone was activated by a dispatcher and sent to an address provided by a 911 caller so that bystanders could use the device, said study lead author Andreas Claesson, RN, of the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm.

    Claesson said it’s not clear if drones can reduce response times in real-life situations. To get a comparison with traditional emergency medical services response times, a drone was placed at a fire station in a rural setting outside of Stockholm.

    The drone, which cost about $20,000, was equipped with a global positioning system, a high-definition camera and integrated with an autopilot software system. It was sent to locations where OHCAs had occurred between 2016-2014 and within a 6.2-mile radius from the fire station.

    The drone used in the study has a range of more than nine miles, and is capable of speeds of up to 45 mph, Claesson said.

    Eighteen remotely operated flights were performed with a median flight distance of about two miles. The median time from call to dispatch of EMS was three minutes. The median time from dispatch to drone launch was 3 seconds. The median time from dispatch to arrival of the drone was 5:21 minutes versus 22 minutes for EMS.

    The drone arrived more quickly than EMS in all cases with a median reduction in response time of 16:39 minutes, the study found.

     

    Comments are closed

    Sorry, but you cannot leave a comment for this post.

     

    Latest Posts

    Latest Video

     
     

    LATEST POSTS

    What To Expect When Going To A Local Therapist

    Much of the population still looks down on therapy and psychologists. The primary reason for this is that therapy is vastly misunderstood by the general…

    Calm Body and Calm Mind: 4 Stress-Relief Strategies You Can Try

    Stress comes in different ways. First, stress can be in the form of acute stress. Acute stress is the kind of stress that you acquire,…

    Programming the Subconscious to Fight Diabetes

    Diabetes is a life-threatening illness that causes strokes, heart attacks, kidney failure, and blindness. Every year, 1.5 million Americans learn they have the illness. For…

    Vision of the Future in AR and Mixed Reality

    SOURCE Hello everyone who is reading our blog In this post I would like to share some of my thoughts and observations on how different…

    Keeping out of Trouble: 3 Scenarios Where Health Insurance Can Drop You

    Your health insurance is incredibly important, which is why the idea of being dropped by your insurance company is so concerning. Your health insurance provider…

    Health Benefits Associated With Drinking Water

      Out all the things that we eat and drink, water stands out as the most important one. When you drink water the body is…

    Artificial Intelligence Diagnoses Heart Murmurs Better Than Expert Cardiologists

    SOURCE Eko’s heart murmur detection algorithm outperformed four out of five cardiologists for the detection of heart murmurs in a recent clinical study. The algorithm…

    Promotion websites www.progressive.ua
    best-cooler.reviews